← Search

Jeffrey Asbell

DE Soto, KS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 34W–48L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Asbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-07-31 · Murphy, Susan · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Desirae McLaughlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Bicknell, Brad · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grant Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-20 · Bicknell, Brad · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-19 · Murphy, Susan · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Desirae McLaughlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · Bicknell, Brad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Shinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · Bicknell, Brad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Klender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · Bicknell, Brad · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Evatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · Bicknell, Brad · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Shinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · Murphy, Susan · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Desirae McLaughlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-26 · Bicknell, Brad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · Bicknell, Brad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · Bicknell, Brad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Nestor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
40.5%
15W–22L · 44.7% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 39.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
15W–15L · 49.3% of games
8.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 32.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert