← Search

Jim Hawkins

Kansas City, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 37W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jim Hawkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-06-23 · Bicknell, Brad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Harned
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · Bicknell, Brad · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Asbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-18 · Bicknell, Brad · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Nestor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-06 · Bicknell, Brad · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Watkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · Bicknell, Brad · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Klender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · Bicknell, Brad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Asbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · HOAWC/Murphy/65&over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · Bicknell, Brad · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-13 · HOAWC/Murphy/65&over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Smart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-28 · Bicknell, Brad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Shinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-22 · HOAWC/Murphy/65&over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-14 · Bicknell, Brad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Klender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
40%
24W–36L · 47.5% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 43.3% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 35.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer