← Search

Heather Sappenfield

Southaven, MS
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
30 matches · 22W–8L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Heather Sappenfield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Anderson · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ellie Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · Anderson · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ellie Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-29 · Gibbs/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ellie Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · Anderson · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ellie Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-26 · Gibbs/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ellie Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · Gibbs/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ellie Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-24 · Gibbs/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ellie Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · Anderson · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ellie Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Marcela Salvador / Gina Cox
2026-08-08 · Gibbs/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ellie Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-31 · Gibbs/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Graham Heard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Arnell 18+ Tri-Level · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lacey Dunlap
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-23 · Garnett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer London
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.1% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 66.3% of games
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova