← Search

Emma Gaines

Oxford, MS
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 28W–12L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Emma Gaines to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Mann CCO · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elizabeth Lyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-10 · Mann CCO · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Priscilla Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · Gaines- NC -Cc Oxford · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hallie Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-30 · Mann CCO · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tracy Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-30 · Gaines- NC -Cc Oxford · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hallie Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-27 · Mann CCO · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elizabeth Lyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-08-24 · Mann CCO · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Caroline Frazer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · Mann CCO · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Priscilla Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-16 · Mann CCO · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Priscilla Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-13 · Gaines- NC -Cc Oxford · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hallie Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-26 · Gaines - NC - CC Oxford · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Haley Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · Gaines - NC - CC Oxford · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ashley Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
65%
13W–7L · 58.6% of games
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 53.2% of games
5.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 60.6% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
13 matches
#1 Singles
13%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova