← Search

Nancy Wedel

— year-end
220 matches · 154W–66L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Wedel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history220 matches
L
Tammy Tegler / Nancy Johnson
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Cummings championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-3
L
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Lori Breshears championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
Angelique Reilly / Rachel Seitz
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Susan Schwerdtfeger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
Nicole Alfaro / Ellen Griffin
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Anne Hope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Jo Lehan / Tory Jorgensen
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Anne Hope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Denise Inman / Felice Rolnick
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · with Anne Hope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Linda Bahan / Lisa Bajema
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Anne Hope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Anne Hope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · Wedel, Nancy · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Hope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · with Anne Hope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · HOA/Bruner/18&over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Hope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · Griffey, Jacque · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brook Vitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Teams56 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 69.7% of games
4.0
71.6%
106W–42L · 57.2% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 70.6% of games
8.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 62% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 30.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
82 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
60 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer