← Search

Denise McCarthy

Leawood, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 60W–73L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Denise McCarthy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-07-22 · Hill, Jennifer · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
L
2026-06-21 · HOA/Hill/55&over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susie Keefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-01 · Geick, Susan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-18 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Geick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · HOA/Hill/55&over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allison Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-04 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-2
W
2026-04-27 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyleen Fishwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-20 · Geick, Susan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyleen Fishwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-19 · HOA/Hill/55&over8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allison Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-13 · Geick, Susan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyleen Fishwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · Geick, Susan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-5
W
2026-03-15 · Geick, Susan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
46.8%
52W–59L · 47.4% of games
8.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams