← Search

Francisco Rangel

Lexington, KY
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 27W–17L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Francisco Rangel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-05-18 · KY/LEX/Cunningham/Rudd · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · KY/LEX/Cunningham/Rudd · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-18 · KY/LEX/Cunningham/Rudd · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · KY/LEX/Cunningham/Rudd · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Bensing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-02 · KY/LEX/Cunningham/Rudd · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Corbett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-02-15 · KY/LEX/Cunningham/Rudd · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-29 · KY/LEX/Cunningham/Rudd · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Bensing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-01-12 · KY/LEX/Cunningham/Rudd · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-12-14 · KY/LEX/Shah · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-11-20 · KY/LEX/Shah · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-11-09 · KY/LEX/Shah · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greer Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-10-22 · KY/LEX/Shah · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shyen Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
76%
19W–6L · 58.2% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 42.3% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 40% of games
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#1 Singles
23%
10 matches
#2 Singles
9%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#3 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal