← Search

Precious Cabiling

— year-end
135 matches · 75W–60L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Precious Cabiling to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-08-08 · Seminole Lake Dsa 7.5 W · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-28 · PINELLAS/Dsa · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Holdstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-07 · PINELLAS/Dsa · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Burnett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · McMullen Oonk · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonya Tobeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · HCC Tennis / J. Price · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Fernald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-31 · PINELLAS/Dsa · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Holdstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · HCC Tennis / J. Price · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-24 · PINELLAS/Dsa · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Abrams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
Natalie Martinez / Lisa Durkin
2026-05-16 · McMullen Oonk · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonya Tobeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
Angela Troupe / Julie Smith
2026-05-15 · HCC Tennis / J. Price · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Fernald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-08 · HCC Tennis / J. Price · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Irene Nasworthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-02 · McMullen Oonk · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams51 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 78.7% of games
4.0
55.9%
38W–30L · 52.4% of games
7.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 50.3% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
48.1%
13W–14L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
27 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams