← Search

Allison Lagman

Oswego, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 22W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Allison Lagman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
L
2025-11-21 · NITA E 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larissa Podstavkova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Carla Page / Loyola Pasiewicz
2025-11-02 · NITA E 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-3
W
2025-06-10 · NITA S 35W40L Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-06-01 · NITA S 35W40L Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Peskind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-13 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Jesseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
Stephanie Remelius / Kathy Robinson
2025-03-23 · NITA W 40W40f Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-5
W
2025-03-16 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Ludwig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-03-09 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Jurcenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-02 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Kirtley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-02 · NITA W 40W40f Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura McEnery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-23 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Ludwig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-02-22 · NITA W 40W40f Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura McEnery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
69.6%
16W–7L · 55.7% of games
4.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 43.7% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova