← Search

Brian Kebschull

San Pedro, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
146 matches · 69W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brian Kebschull to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history146 matches
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Goff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Carly Capper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-27 · BC-Kramer/BrianKebschull4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Magome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chad Somers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · BC-Kramer/BrianKebschull4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Mikolaitis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Carly Capper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
John Loo / John Nguyen
2026-06-13 · BC-Kramer/BrianKebschull4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Palmieri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Amanda McCarthy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · BC-Kramer/BrianKebschull4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Magome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · BC-Kramer/BrianKebschull4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Magome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric VanderPloeg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
46.2%
61W–71L · 48.1% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 46.5% of games
0.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 60.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
38 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe