← Search

Paula Danis

— year-end
155 matches · 94W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Paula Danis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
W
2026-07-20 · Queen City Ivory · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashlee Kenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Queen City Ivory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with MacKenzie Hammel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · Queen City Ivory · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Shafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Queen City Silver · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashlee Kenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · Queen City Ivory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Besl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · Queen City Ivory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashlee Kenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-18 · Queen City Ivory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Sayles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-03-27 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Besl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-20 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Sayles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Sharon Palatchi / Anna Huse
2026-01-30 · Queen City Chrome · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ahrens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-11-07 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 5-0
W
2025-10-17 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Nye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 2-0
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
68.8%
75W–34L · 57.5% of games
4.5
30.8%
8W–18L · 42.2% of games
8.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 53.6% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova