← Search

Merri Beth Hebeler

— year-end
136 matches · 81W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Merri Beth Hebeler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
W
2026-07-27 · Queen City Red · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · Queen City Purple · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bonnie Lang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · Queen City Red · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Toerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · Queen City Red · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Keith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Jennifer Evans / Donna Griffor
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alicia Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Queen City Red · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lauren Keith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Mazzone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-18 · Queen City Red · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Ann Schinaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-20 · Queen City Orange · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Felicia Bourbon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Amanda Brown / Ann Baer
2026-02-06 · Queen City Orange · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Felicia Bourbon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-5
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
62.2%
56W–34L · 52.3% of games
4.5
38.5%
10W–16L · 41% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 65.9% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
23 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer