← Search

Jennifer Petersen

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
211 matches · 116W–95L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jennifer Petersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history211 matches
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Bandera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Ace holes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alma Siri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · Ace holes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alma Siri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · Ace holes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Wall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-03 · Ace holes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Siri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · Die Hards S Wkday · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-17 · Die Hards S Wkday · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Lindsay Kelso
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Anakristel Payne
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-11 · Die Hards S Wkday · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.1% of games
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
57.2%
87W–65L · 54.6% of games
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 43% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
27.8%
5W–13L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 47% of the time
#1 Singles
47%
99 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
53 matches
#2 Singles
15%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe