← Search

Jamie Slonaker

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 91W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jamie Slonaker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history174 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Erica Drake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · NOR-Mathew · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · NOR-Mathew · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-15 · NOR-Mathew · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Mathew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · NOR-Mathew · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Mathew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Lindsey Kahler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · NOR-Mathew · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Mathew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · LOTC-Mendenhall · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kayleen Mendenhall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-29 · LOTC-Mendenhall · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · LOTC-Mendenhall · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · LOTC-Mendenhall · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · LOTC-Mendenhall · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2015–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 59.2% of games
4.5
25%
8W–24L · 39.6% of games
4.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.9% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.3% of games
8.0mixed
71.9%
23W–9L · 56.2% of games
9.0mixed
50%
18W–18L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
42 matches
#1 Singles
14%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
22 matches
#2 Singles
13%
22 matches
#1 Female Doubles
12%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams