← Search

Katherine Crews

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 86W–63L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Katherine Crews to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-09-11 · AYTC-Court IQ-Crews · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mila Niset
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-31 · FC-Extra Salty Mixed Nuts-Mar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ian Bucklin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · HBSQ-Furman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Max Genereaux mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · FC-Extra Salty Mixed Nuts-Mar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ian Bucklin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-19 · HBSQ-Furman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Lynagh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · Ballers 2.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Combs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Ballers 2.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christa Eadson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-28 · FC-Extra Salty Mixed Nuts-Mar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rakesh Mallela mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-05-24 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Combs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandi Counter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-05-03 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eunji Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Pollock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
60.2%
50W–33L · 55.4% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 36% of games
7.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 60.1% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
51.6%
16W–15L · 50.9% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
38 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer