← Search

Mandi Counter

Shoreline, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 117W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mandi Counter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Jody Okamura championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Mary Rich championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Chutimont Blacksmith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jody Okamura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-24 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Rich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Crews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-04-11 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Rich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-05 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jody Okamura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-02-08 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Rich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-01 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katrina Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-01-25 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Rich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-01-03 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jody Okamura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
74.6%
53W–18L · 60.2% of games
3.5
58.7%
27W–19L · 50.7% of games
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.8% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 62% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
31 matches
#1 Singles
14%
23 matches
#2 Singles
8%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova