← Search

Chelsea Clement

Madisonville, LA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 15W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Chelsea Clement to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Green/18s/5.5/PAC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kelly Greer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-18 · Green/18s/5.5/PAC · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Beth Almond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · Klocek/40s/5.5/PAC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Marilyn Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · Klocek/40s/5.5/PAC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kim LeBlanc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-04 · Green/18s/5.5/PAC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kelly Greer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · Klocek/18s/2.5/PAC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alexander Mata Iv mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · Klocek/18s/2.5/PAC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Eric Tagesen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · Klocek/18s/2.5/PAC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alexander Mata Iv mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · Klocek/18s/2.5/PAC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alexander Mata Iv mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-27 · Bonanno-Burns/18s/3.5-2.5/PAC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Sulzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
Emma Clark / Camille Mcneil
2026-05-05 · Klocek/18s/2.52/PAC Night · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Klocek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-24 · Klocek/18s/2.52/PAC Night · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Klocek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
6W–6L · 51.3% of games
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 27.3% of games
5.5
50%
5W–5L · 48.6% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
9 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova