Helena Weiss
Lexington, KY
35 matches · 32W–3L · seasons 2023–2024
Captains: add Helena Weiss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history35 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Tange Skaggs / Taylor Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Taylor Jackson / Denise Hartmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 70% of games
8.5
100%
10W–0L · 69.6% of games
4.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#1 Singles
11%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.