← Search

Connie Peterson

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 54W–36L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Connie Peterson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Yu.Hager18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-06 · Yu.Hager18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rachael Kiker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-10 · Yu.Hager18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-29 · Yu.Hager18T · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hallie Shinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-22 · Ta.Borsuk18A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-4
L
2026-04-09 · Ta.Borsuk18A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-4
L
2026-04-02 · Ta.Borsuk18A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-26 · Ta.Borsuk18A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-19 · Ta.Borsuk18A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-18 · Ta.Borsuk18A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-04 · Ta.Borsuk18A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-10-09 · Je.Nguyen18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Yuwie Hager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
60.4%
32W–21L · 57% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 54.3% of games
8.5
60%
6W–4L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
37 matches
#1 Singles
24%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams