← Search

Yuwie Hager

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
268 matches · 182W–86L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Yuwie Hager to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history268 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Yu.Hager18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gillian Sellick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-01 · La.Ross18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sonet Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-28 · Ke.Townsend40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Camille Conzola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-21 · Ke.Townsend40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rochelle Grieco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-20 · Yu.Hager18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hallie Shinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · #2 Doubles · with Jenny Nguyen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · Yu.Hager18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Fungaroli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-06 · TOC.Armstrong · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chunyan Xie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · La.Ross18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vanese Clough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Amanda Williams / Kate Cannon
2026-07-30 · Yu.Hager18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Susan Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · TOC.Rogers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Kouskolekas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · Er.Wynia40T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 76.1% of games
3.5
73.6%
53W–19L · 62% of games
4.0
58.5%
38W–27L · 54.5% of games
4.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 53.5% of games
6.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.3% of games
7.5
74.4%
29W–10L · 62.6% of games
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.9% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
105 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
48 matches
#1 Singles
5%
14 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova