← Search

Lori West

— year-end
235 matches · 165W–70L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lori West to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history235 matches
W
2026-08-16 · STC-Brann · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Wehrkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-09 · STC-Brann · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Celeste Hartings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Veronica Smallwood / Kimberly Brown
2026-07-19 · STC-Brann · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie Leadman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · STC-Brann · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michele Brann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · STC-Brann · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Brann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · STC-Brann · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Wehrkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-31 · STC-Brann · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Wehrkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
Christy Smith / Liz Ludwig
2026-05-28 · STC-Brann · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michele Brann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · STC-Brann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Wehrkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-30 · QRRC-Soller · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · STC-Brann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Brann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-09 · QRRC-Soller · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Brann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Teams69 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 73% of games
4.0
72.7%
72W–27L · 59.6% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 56.6% of games
7.5
69%
20W–9L · 59.5% of games
8.0
100%
14W–0L · 65.1% of games
7.0mixed
64.3%
18W–10L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
90 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
41 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova