← Search

Veronica Smallwood

— year-end
196 matches · 164W–32L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Veronica Smallwood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history196 matches
W
2026-09-10 · QRRC/SRTC-Burkle/Tabrah · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · KTC-Anderson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Borneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · QRRC-Trubee · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Collin McAndrew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-16 · KTC-Anderson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Tritz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-19 · KTC-Anderson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · KTC-Corbean · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Courtney Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · QRRC-Trubee · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Collin McAndrew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-17 · QRRC-Haney · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Smallwood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-12 · KTC-Anderson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Danielle Menningmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · KTC-Trubee · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Dye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · KTC-Corbean · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Ostrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
Dane Ranney / Kimberly Taylor
2026-06-19 · QRRC-Trubee · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Collin McAndrew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
Teams44 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.1% of games
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.3% of games
3.5
88.2%
30W–4L · 67.3% of games
4.0
83.3%
40W–8L · 67.1% of games
4.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 62.3% of games
5.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.6% of games
6.5
100%
13W–0L · 73.9% of games
7.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 62.5% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
87.5%
21W–3L · 65.7% of games
8.0mixed
77.3%
17W–5L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams