← Search

Anne Vargo

Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 25W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Anne Vargo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-09-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cecilia Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Marley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-16 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristina Rosas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cristina Rosas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-02 · Treece/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with J Marie Huthwaite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
Sara Johnson
2026-04-26 · AR 3.5W 18 & Over (Letts) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · Nelson-Zana/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Talia McGowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Lasater/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katy Lollar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Michelle van Schenck / Stephanie Johnson
2026-04-19 · AR 3.5W 18 & Over (Letts) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Talia McGowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-08 · Lasater/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Benefield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-06 · AR 3.5W 18 & Over (Letts) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Lollar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-30 · Nelson-Zana/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbi Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 53.2% of games
4.0
40%
4W–6L · 41.7% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 55% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#1 Singles
20%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert