← Search

Michelle van Schenck

— year-end
66 matches · 27W–39L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Michelle van Schenck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeanie Shade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · Trout/Bentonville/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Trout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Trout/Bentonville/KTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sydney Lank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Best mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Bell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Kinsey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Best mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-3
L
2026-06-20 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-13 · Anzalone/Centerton/KTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-13 · Anzalone/Centerton/KTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · Anzalone/Centerton/KTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Faith Hendricks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
48.7%
19W–20L · 48.4% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 33.9% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.6% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 24% of the time
#1 Singles
24%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches
#3 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe