← Search

Beth Petersen

NIWOT, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 63W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Petersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-08-04 · BCC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Londa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · BCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Forward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-23 · BCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Forward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · BCC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annah Worland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · BCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandi Lipton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalia Harms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · BCC GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Londa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · BCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-21 · BCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Forward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-14 · BCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Eisenhard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-12 · BCC GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Stroiman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-16 · BCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Forward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
65.6%
61W–32L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
15 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert