← Search

Natalia Harms

BOULDER, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 50W–25L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Natalia Harms to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-09-03 · BCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-27 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annah Worland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-26 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annah Worland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nora Astley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Heather
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · BCC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Honea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-30 · BCC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annah Worland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · BCC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trisha Beaudin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-04 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · BCC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with MARGARET GOTTLIEB
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-26 · BCC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Mark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-14 · BCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan MacIntosh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 60.4% of games
3.5
65.7%
44W–23L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#1 Singles
9%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova