← Search

Bonita Thistle

Lakewood, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
268 matches · 115W–153L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bonita Thistle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history268 matches
L
2026-08-23 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kevin Thistle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · LTC-D YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jo Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-05 · LTC-D NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jo Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-02 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kevin Thistle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · LTC-D YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jo Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-29 · LTC-D NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jo Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Nguyen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-23 · LTC-D YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terri Jenney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bruce Robertson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-16 · LTC-D YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Romer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · LTC-D NAVY · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Lora Griffith / Lisa Martin
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Terri Jenney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
47.7%
62W–68L · 50.1% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 56.1% of games
7.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 27.7% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.4% of games
6.5mixed
34.8%
8W–15L · 46.5% of games
7.0mixed
35.7%
15W–27L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
112 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
94 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
60 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert