← Search

Terri Jenney

Golden, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
195 matches · 122W–73L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Terri Jenney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history195 matches
W
2026-08-06 · LTC-D YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Johanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-30 · LTC-D YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Johanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · LTC-D YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bonita Thistle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Stiebeling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Lora Griffith / Lisa Martin
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Bonita Thistle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Pamela Marsh / Rene Moore
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Bonita Thistle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-09 · LTC-D YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Liz Hafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Hock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · LTC-D YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bonita Thistle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Hock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · LTC-D RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judith McKinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50.9%
29W–28L · 54.3% of games
3.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.2% of games
6.0
86.5%
64W–10L · 64% of games
7.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
103 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
36 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert