← Search

Gregg Palmer

Lake Oswego, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
264 matches · 186W–78L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Gregg Palmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history264 matches
W
2026-09-12 · MPRC-Mendenhall/Palmer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Cooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Li Tang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-09 · MPRC-Mendenhall/Palmer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Dudley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · You Cannot Be Serious · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zhitong Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-03 · You Cannot Be Serious · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zhitong Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-31 · NOR-THPRD-Horenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Li Tang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · NOR-THPRD-Horenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jaime Venezia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · NOR-THPRD-Horenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adriana McCord mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · You Cannot Be Serious · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zhitong Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · NOR-THPRD-Horenstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Horenstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · MPRC-Mendenhall/Palmer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Benkstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · You Cannot Be Serious · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tod Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 65.1% of games
4.0
65.5%
57W–30L · 56.7% of games
4.5
30%
3W–7L · 42.9% of games
7.0mixed
80%
40W–10L · 62.6% of games
8.0mixed
83%
44W–9L · 61.5% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 65% of the time
#1 Doubles
65%
171 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
34 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer