← Search

Cheryl Baber

Tulsa, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 64W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cheryl Baber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Crowder/LF/tri 4.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel DeWitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-13 · Crowder/LF/tri 4.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Crowder/LF/tri 4.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with April Bonnet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-16 · Crowder/LF/tri 4.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-11 · Crowder/LF/18s 4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Stitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-09 · Whitten 55s 8.0 /LF · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Whitten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · Whitten 55s 8.0 /LF · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ginger Wade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · Whitten 55s 8.0 /LF · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Whitten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-07 · Crowder/LF/18s 4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Stitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-21 · Whitten 55s 8.0 /LF · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Blackim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-14 · Whitten 55s 8.0 /LF · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Grunst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · Whitten 55s 8.0 /LF · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Grunst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 52.5% of games
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 41.9% of games
3.5
80.6%
25W–6L · 65.7% of games
4.0
44.4%
12W–15L · 47.7% of games
7.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 52.4% of games
8.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert