← Search

Stephanie Galles

— year-end
159 matches · 108W–51L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Stephanie Galles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Tasker/PH/40&over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-1
W
2026-09-09 · Vann/PH/Day4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Hassell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · Griffith/LF/Day4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
W
2026-09-01 · Smith/LF/4.5 W tri · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Snapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-20 · Smith/LF/4.5 W tri · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Snapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · Smith/LF/4.5 W tri · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Snapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Snapp/LF 18s 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caroline Snapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · Williams/PH 18s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · Williams/PH 18s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kolsen Mclaughlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-03 · Harris/PH 4.0W 18s · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Joseph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-02 · Snapp/LF 18s 4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susie Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · Williams/PH 18s 7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
Teams47 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 55% of games
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 50.3% of games
4.0
78.4%
40W–11L · 62.8% of games
4.5
57.4%
27W–20L · 49.8% of games
8.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.4% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 44% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
70%
21W–9L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
46 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer