← Search

Mia Birk

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 27W–17L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mia Birk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-06-14 · MAC-Leedy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · MAC-Leedy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · MAC-Leedy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Corwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-15 · MAC-Hill/Weinstein · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-19 · MAC-Hill/Weinstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Koerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-13 · MAC-Hill/Weinstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicolle Lochner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2023-10-07 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-05-05 · MAC-Cooney/Hopson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-04-22 · MAC-Cooney/Hopson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-04-15 · MAC-Cooney/Hopson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marilyn von Bergen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-03-19 · MAC-Cooney/Hopson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2023-02-19 · MAC-Cooney/Hopson · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 71.8% of games
3.5
56%
14W–11L · 47.4% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 27% of the time
#2 Singles
27%
12 matches
#1 Singles
25%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe