← Search

Stacy Clemson

— year-end
148 matches · 55W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stacy Clemson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Bringard/Broadbent · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lissi Rabon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · Bringard/Broadbent · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Rackley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-20 · Bringard/Broadbent · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Martha Broadbent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-05 · Smashing Slice Girls · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ina Fricchione
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-02 · Love Hurts · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Sweeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · Love Hurts · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Devon Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-01 · Smashing Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Devon Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-28 · Love Hurts · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ina Fricchione
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-24 · Smashing Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ina Fricchione
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-02-19 · Smashing Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Kenney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-5
L
2026-02-11 · Love Hurts · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ina Fricchione
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-5, 0-1
L
2026-01-29 · Smashing Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Kenney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-3, 0-1
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
80%
12W–3L · 59% of games
3.5
38.2%
13W–21L · 48.8% of games
4.0
22.8%
18W–61L · 38.9% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
25 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
15 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova