← Search

Nancy Landau

Devon, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 67W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Landau to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
L
2026-08-11 · UMLY 55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Rejonis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · UMLY 55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Krane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-30 · UMLY 55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy MacKay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · Tight Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Krane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-5
W
2026-05-31 · Tight Aces · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Graziani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-19 · Love Hurts · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Rejonis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · Tight Aces · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Krane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-01 · WaynesBrook · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hilbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-19 · No Drama Mamas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Szipszky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-01-29 · No Drama Mamas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Szipszky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-5, 1-0
L
2025-12-18 · No Drama Mamas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maritza Guillocheau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-05-09 · WaynesBrook · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Reaume
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 59.9% of games
4.0
39.8%
33W–50L · 46.2% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 60.4% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
40 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer