← Search

Zana Piric

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
310 matches · 135W–175L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Zana Piric to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history310 matches
L
2026-08-22 · Su.Paeplow18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin McAllister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · Su.Paeplow18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Valerie Szwarc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-13 · Ch.Hochstrasser40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marjorie Diaz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · Su.Paeplow18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marcia Fort
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-03 · ABaxley.55.6.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-01 · Su.Paeplow18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Kindelan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · Me.Everitt18M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Fu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · Er.McAllister40T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eva Garland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · TOC.Stutt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with NEALE STUTT mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Me.Everitt18M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Fu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · Me.Everitt18M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Brock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · TOC.Stutt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with NEALE STUTT mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 45.3% of games
4.0
44.6%
75W–93L · 48.7% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 32.3% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
44.2%
34W–43L · 49.5% of games
3.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57% of games
4.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 47.3% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57.5% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
113 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
98 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
58 matches
#1 Singles
6%
18 matches
#2 Singles
5%
14 matches
#3 Singles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova