← Search

Cheri Kivisto

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 92W–50L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Cheri Kivisto to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
L
2026-08-27 · An.Redmond40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Fultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-19 · Ki.Manning40C5.5 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meredith Russo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-18 · Ki.Manning55C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · An.Redmond40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Fogarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · An.Redmond40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-31 · Jo.Nance55M3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ayden Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · Jo.Nance40M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Douglass mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-20 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Redmond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rossi Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ana Maria Allessi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · Jo.Nance40M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Buckingham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-19 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Redmond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
61.9%
26W–16L · 57.8% of games
3.0
63.6%
28W–16L · 55.9% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
75%
9W–3L · 56.8% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 55.3% of games
3.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 65% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
41 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert