← Search

Melissa Hoover

— year-end
128 matches · 72W–56L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Melissa Hoover to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-09-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Keating
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-02 · BHSC - Ryan - Overserved · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-29 · BHSC - Ryan - Overserved · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Nicholaou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-26 · BHSC - Ryan - Overserved · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emilyann Steinbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Kelly Berry / Rose Yuen
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Jenny Furlow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Carrie Cooper championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Belinda Blankenship championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · BHSC - Ryan - Overserved · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emilyann Steinbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · BHSC - Ryan - Overserved · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Lindauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-03 · BHSC - Ryan - Overserved · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · BHSC - Ryan - Overserved · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-23 · BHSC - Hoover · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 66.2% of games
3.5
64%
32W–18L · 55.2% of games
6.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.2% of games
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 42% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
22 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert