← Search

Amanda Daniero

Charlottesville, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 111W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amanda Daniero to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
L
2026-08-26 · BHSC - Lerner - Sister-Love · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-22 · BHSC - Lerner - Sister-Love · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Beverage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-16 · BHSC - Davis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Omar Garriott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-12 · BHSC - Lerner - Sister-Love · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · BHSC - Daniero · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-22 · Ind - Jorgensen - Spare Parts · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mohan Nadkarni mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · BHSC - Daniero · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Anne Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Cory Brown / Wendy Beale
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Kelly Lindauer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · Ind - Jorgensen - Spare Parts · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Schmidt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
Noelle Crews / CONSTANCE MATTOX
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Kelly Lindauer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Maggie Mudd championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-07 · Ind - Jorgensen - Spare Parts · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Baker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 58.6% of games
3.5
74.7%
56W–19L · 57.3% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 58.4% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43.2% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#1 Singles
8%
13 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert