← Search

Julia Bartosh

— year-end
20 matches · 7W–13L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Julia Bartosh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
W
2026-09-09 · AGC Aces · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amanda Neczypor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Michele King / Laura Buchner
2026-06-19 · Simply Smashing · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-12 · Simply Smashing · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gwynne Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · Simply Smashing · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Burton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · Simply Smashing · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Walheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-10-15 · AGC ACES · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Bucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-5
W
2025-09-24 · AGC ACES · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Bucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-09-17 · AGC ACES · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Finley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-03 · AGC ACES · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Walheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-5
L
Elizabeth Austin / Mary Brewster
2025-06-20 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Walheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-06 · Simply Smashing · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Walheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5
W
Erin Dinger / Jill Cohen
2025-05-23 · Simply Smashing · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Walheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams5 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 42.7% of games
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #4 Doubles, 40% of the time
#4 Doubles
40%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams