← Search

Sarah Kull

Oyster Bay, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 89W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Kull to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Emma Brandt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-0
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Susan Lee / Ginny Barnes
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Tracy Kleinberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
Patricia Lee / Marsha Silverman
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · with Erin Anderson Katzman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-07-21 · HIT, Giovanni/Kleinberg · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emma Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · HIT, Brandt/Kull · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emma Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-16 · HIT, Brandt/Kull · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emma Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · LI: HIT/Roslyn, Kleinberg/Imberman · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-5
L
2026-07-07 · HIT, Giovanni/Kleinberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emma Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · HIT, Brandt/Kull · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emma Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 66.5% of games
3.5
70%
28W–12L · 58.6% of games
4.0
65%
39W–21L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
10 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King