← Search

Emma Brandt

HUNTINGTON, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 76W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emma Brandt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Sarah Kull championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-0
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Jana Lindover championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Deborah Cichon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Jane Walsh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · HIT, Giovanni/Kleinberg · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Kull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · HIT, Brandt/Kull · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Kull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-16 · HIT, Brandt/Kull · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Kull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · LI: HIT/Roslyn, Kleinberg/Imberman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen Ganiaris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-5
L
2026-07-07 · HIT, Giovanni/Kleinberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Kull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · HIT, Brandt/Kull · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Kull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
72.6%
69W–26L · 57% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova