← Search

James McDaniel

Portsmouth, NH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
155 matches · 91W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James McDaniel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
L
2026-06-16 · CED:Cedardale:Rubera · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacques Ludman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · SFTNA:Spark-NA:Over Served:van Ravestyn · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Lambert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-27 · SFTNA:Spark-NA:Over Served:van Ravestyn · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Gilbody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-26 · CED:Cedardale:Rubera · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Demore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · SFTNA:Spark-NA:Over Served:van Ravestyn · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raju Metpelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-01 · CED:Team Redemption Part 2:Stuart · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6
L
2026-04-24 · SFT:Spark Green:Evan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexandra Warren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-27 · SFT:Spark Green:Evan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexandra Warren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-03-13 · SFT:Spark Green:Evan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dena Madden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-06 · CED:Team Redemption Part 2:Stuart · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · CED:Team Redemption Part 2:Stuart · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-13 · SFT:Spark Green:Evan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Surette mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
65.2%
30W–16L · 56% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 37.9% of games
6.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.1% of games
6.0mixed
62.3%
38W–23L · 52.4% of games
7.0mixed
58.1%
18W–13L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
28 matches
#1 Singles
7%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer