← Search

Douglas Swatski

North Andover, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 32W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Douglas Swatski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-07-20 · CED:Cedardale:Rubera · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Judge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · CED:Cedardale:Rubera · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Demore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · CED:Cedardale:Rubera · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott MacMillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · CED:Cedardale:Rubera · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott MacMillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · CED:Cedardale:Rubera · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott MacMillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-12 · CED:Cedardale:Rubera · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott MacMillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heather Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-27 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Romano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-13 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Romano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-01-16 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Romano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-02 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bridget MacMillan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2025-12-26 · CED:Swinging Volleys:Moore · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Romano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
36.1%
13W–23L · 47.1% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 38.6% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 44.8% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 41.8% of games
7.0mixed
52.2%
12W–11L · 47.6% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer