← Search

Catherine Pinto

HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 22W–24L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Catherine Pinto to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
Karin Olson Hoal / Lori Clark
2026-07-09 · KC-RH ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laurie Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · KC-RH ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Moinet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-28 · KC-RH ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Darlene Gonzales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · KC-CC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Moinet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · KC-CC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annamaria Augustine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Sarah Hays / Sheryl Rose
2026-03-14 · KC: ZAC · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Zenta Pakulis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-02-18 · KC: ZAC · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Zenta Pakulis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-16 · KC: ZAC · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Zenta Pakulis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-07-10 · KC-RH ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laurie Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-09 · KC-CC RED · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-07-03 · KC-RH ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laurie van Sickle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-02 · KC-CC RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
90%
9W–1L · 67.1% of games
2.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 54.3% of games
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 37% of games
6.0
40%
6W–9L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#1 Female Doubles
22%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova