← Search

Erik Overberger

Bay Village, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 29W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erik Overberger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-07-14 · A40 3.0M AO2 Hansen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ted MacFarlane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · A40 3.0M AO2 Hansen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ron Salim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · A40 3.0M AO2 Hansen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ron Salim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Mike Toncar / David Westerfield
2026-05-26 · A40 3.0M AO2 Hansen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Sutor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-19 · A40 3.0M AO2 Hansen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rick Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-07 · C 6.5M MM5 Waziri · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karan Amlani
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-10-26 · C 6.5M MM5 Waziri · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kade Wagner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
Brian Moore / Mike la Londe
2025-10-17 · C 6.5M MM5 Waziri · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Adnan Kazazic
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-10-10 · C 6.5M MM5 Waziri · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Peter Comodeca Ii
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-16 · A40 3.0M AO2 Hansen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul E Girgash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-15 · A18 3.5M MV1 Gau · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Corrie Trouw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-07-02 · A40 3.0M AO2 Hansen · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greg Matzinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
31.9%
23W–49L · 44.4% of games
3.5
16.7%
4W–20L · 36.8% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova