← Search

Julie Netz

— year-end
20 matches · 13W–7L · seasons 2020–2021

Captains: add Julie Netz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
W
2021-06-24 · Court Junkies · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Sheehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2021-06-15 · Court Junkies · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dawn Lafrades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2021-06-12 · Court Junkies · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynda Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2021-06-03 · Court Junkies · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynda Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2021-05-25 · Court Junkies · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Sheehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2021-05-20 · Court Junkies · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary K Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2021-05-18 · Court Junkies · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynda Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Hollace Claiborn / Karen Weaver
2021-05-13 · Court Junkies · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynda Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2021-04-29 · Court Junkies · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynda Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2021-04-20 · Court Junkies · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dawn Lafrades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2021-04-15 · Court Junkies · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary K Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2021-04-09 · Court Junkies · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary K Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams4 teams · 2020–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 65.2% of games
6.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 59.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
3 matches
#2 Singles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams