← Search

Anne Comstock

MCCALL, ID
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
68 matches · 34W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anne Comstock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
2026-06-23 · Net Queens · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Portia Rauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · Net Queens · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Portia Rauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-13 · Chick Kickers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Portia Rauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-2
L
2023-06-05 · Chick Kickers · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-05-23 · Fine Whines · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katrina Basye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2023-05-15 · Chick Kickers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Finnegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-01 · Chick Kickers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-04-24 · Chick Kickers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Finnegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2023-04-18 · Chick Kickers · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-04-13 · Chick Kickers · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret McNulty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2023-04-10 · Chick Kickers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katrina Basye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-04-04 · Chick Kickers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Portia Rauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 53.8% of games
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 45.5% of games
6.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 47.3% of games
6.5mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer