← Search

Amber Greenwood

Heber City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
259 matches · 173W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amber Greenwood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history259 matches
L
Meghan Rovelli / Sandee Kozel
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Carly Reese championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-03 · Heber Valley Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Probst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-29 · Heber Valley Tennis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-23 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rina Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-10 · Heber Valley Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · Heber Valley Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandy Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-07 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Probst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · Heber Valley Tennis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Probst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Rina Benson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rina Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
69.6%
48W–21L · 57.6% of games
3.5
71.9%
41W–16L · 60.2% of games
4.0
67.3%
72W–35L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
63 matches
#1 Singles
19%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
33 matches
#2 Singles
9%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams