← Search

Rachel Klein

— year-end
140 matches · 102W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Klein to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
W
2026-08-31 · LIB-Dawson 6.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christopher Li mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-26 · LIB-Dawson 6.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christopher Li mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-05 · LIB-Dawson 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Pohl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-29 · LIB-Dawson 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · LIB- Marley 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thu Kehn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Sweet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Anu Whitelocke / Julie Smith
2026-06-01 · LIB-Dawson 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Gensheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · LIB- Marley 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-05-20 · LIB- Marley 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Qi Gao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-18 · LIB-Dawson 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-13 · LIB- Marley 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Gensheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-12 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsea Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 54.9% of games
3.5
73.5%
61W–22L · 62.4% of games
4.0
64.3%
18W–10L · 52.9% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#1 Singles
10%
14 matches
#2 Singles
7%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert