← Search

Christopher Li

Ann Arbor, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 38W–12L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Christopher Li to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-08-31 · LIB-Dawson 6.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Klein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-26 · LIB-Dawson 6.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Klein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elissa Bayraktar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-17 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frances Carlson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
W
Erik Sangeorzan
2026-07-16 · LIB-Atkinson 18s 3.0M F2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · LIB-Atkinson 18s 3.0M F2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · LIB-Atkinson 18s 3.0M F2 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-03 · LIB-Katakowski 18s 3.5M F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yoshihiro Mochizuki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-28 · LIB-Atkinson 18s 3.0M F2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · LIB-Katakowski 18s 3.5M F2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · LIB-Rosenwasser LOW TRI MEN F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Ward
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · LIB-Rosenwasser LOW TRI MEN F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicholas Harley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 58.2% of games
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 51.4% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 70.5% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 63.5% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
10%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer